The ads that plaster the shiny silver walls of the subway cards show extreme variation in photographic quality. You have the national firms like Budweiser throwing money at extremely detailed Photoshopped compositions of gorgeous, airbrushed models dancing around an impossibly sweaty beer bottle. You have the "learn to read English!" ads using the same stock photos they had when I arrived in NYC in '96. And then there are ads like the one for Interboro Community College. The ad itself is a fairly nice design, and it features students who used the college to get ahead. But the photos, obviously taken by a random office guy with a point-and-shoot, look something like this:
The problem is that it undercuts the whole ad. Frankly, if NYU ran photos like that with their ads, people might think they're being edgy. Here, it says "this is a college so third-rate that it couldn't afford $500 for nice headshots." And of course they could afford it -- they afforded the ad placement, after all. Given that these colleges are trying to convince the commuting world that they should be taken seriously, the photos ensure a big part of their ad budget goes to waste. It's a textbook case of how some companies can be penny-wise, pound-foolish.