Ryan (ryanbrenizer) wrote,
Ryan
ryanbrenizer

Hey, wedding photographers: Stop the Tilting!

Untitled-1


As a Web-savvy wedding photographer, I look at a lot of wedding-related pictures. A lot. Wedding photography has come a long way since the days of soft-focus lenses and an album filled with 50 near-identical grip-and-grins, but not all trends are so welcome. For some reason, as part of the transition from formal-style to candid-style, a lot of wedding photographers literally went off-kilter, tilting wildly to fit important elements in the frame, and it somehow went from a sign of desperation to an aesthetic.

Specifically, I mean the photos that include a strong sense of horizon, whether through the actual horizon or of people standing up -- macros rarely give a sense of tilting, for instance, since there's little sense of which way is up in the first place. But I've seen albums where the average photo was off by 30 degrees or more. Individually, some of the photos can be excellent, but taken together, it will have you reaching for the Dramamine.

Which brings me to my point: Tilting is a gimmick. Now, I have no problems with gimmicks, particularly in wedding photography, where you have to get as varied an array of photos as possible in a short period of time. I like fisheye, I like Lensbabies, I like motion blur. But gimmicks are like Joe Pesci -- best in small quantities. We love Joe in Goodfellas, but we don't want him to be the romantic lead. Beware of gimmicks, and beware of trends -- in the future it will be too easy for someone to look at a wedding album, see a formal tilted 45 degrees, and say "Ooooh, you got married in the 2000s!" Tilting is our decade's AquaNet.

I'm not a purist. I had a photography professor who considered vertical photos to be gimmicky -- *that's* a purist. But I realize that a tilted photo looks better at the time of capture -- when the photographer has a solid sense of the actual horizon -- than as a print, where it often looks a bit weird. The ironic part is that tilting started as part of wedding "photojournalism," but photojournalists don't tilt -- they follow the action, of course, but I've seen what happens in a newsroom when a photographer turns in deliberately tilted shots: if they're lucky, they get an askance eyebrow and a gruff "Next time, shoot sober." I had a predecessor get fired, in part, for tilting: another thing that show how wedding clients can differ in their choices from art directors and photo editors, who deal with photographers for a living.
Tags: photography, rant
Subscribe

  • Flickr releases stats

    Flickr has released a detailed stats page for paid users, including all referrals for each image and overall … including search engine terms. I…

  • Flickr Meetup: Flickrazzi take on Striatic

    Flickr Meetup: Flickrazzi take on Striatic Originally uploaded by carpeicthus. Yes, I went to a Flickr picnic in the park. Yes, I had fun.…

  • Well, hello there.

    Is this thing on? PS, I'm now at RyanBrenizer.com/blog.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 12 comments

  • Flickr releases stats

    Flickr has released a detailed stats page for paid users, including all referrals for each image and overall … including search engine terms. I…

  • Flickr Meetup: Flickrazzi take on Striatic

    Flickr Meetup: Flickrazzi take on Striatic Originally uploaded by carpeicthus. Yes, I went to a Flickr picnic in the park. Yes, I had fun.…

  • Well, hello there.

    Is this thing on? PS, I'm now at RyanBrenizer.com/blog.